Watch the short (11 minute) interview video clip with Judah Folkman (note the date of the interview), and read "Cancer Warrior" interview text available at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/judah-folkman.html
If science is based on observation, why did researchers still criticize Dr. Folkman’s hypothesis of angiogenesis after the rabbit eye experiments? Do you think that researchers today would have had the same reaction/criticism? Why or why not?
